Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 4;7(10):11380–11396. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7193

Table 5. Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival after disease progression during second-line therapy.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value
Second-line chemotherapy regimen
 FOLFIRI 1 - - 1 - -
 FOLFOX 0.966 0.677–1.379 0.848 1.082 0.748–1.565 0.675
Second-line continued cetuximab
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 0.585 0.407–0.841 0.004* 0.663 0.454–0.969 0.034*
Second-line maintenance treatment
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 0.491 0.274–0.881 0.017* 0.745 0.389–1.425 0.373
Following TACE/TAI for metastases
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 0.704 0.464–1.067 0.098 0.886 0.570–1.376 0.589
Following Radiofrequency for metastases
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 1.328 0.746–2.364 0.336 1.278 0.735–2.220 0.385
Following Radiotherapy for metastases
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 1.028 0.565–1.870 0.928 1.139 0.615–2.109 0.678
Following chemotherapy
 Best support care 1 - - 1 - -
 Intensive chemotherapy§ 0.437 0.233–0.816 0.009* 0.417 0.219–0.792 0.008*
Following bevacizumab
 No 1 - - 1 - -
 Yes 0.564 0.351–0.906 0.018* 0.644 0.391–1.060 0.084

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; TACE: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; TAI: transcatheter arterial infusion.

§

Intensive chemotherapy: receiving at least one intravenous chemotherapy medicine.

P values were calculated using Cox regression.

Bold font for P < 0.10;

*

for P < 0.05.