Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 8;202(4):1289–1297. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.179846

Table 2. Type I error rate (%) of each test under the null hypothesis of no interaction effect, i.e., γ=0.

Type I error rate (%)
Probit Logit Log penetrance
Tests d.f. p=10% p=1% p=0.1% p=10% p=1% p=0.1% p=10% p=1% p=0.1%
A. β1=β2=0
SI 4 4.96 5.28 5.07 5.22 4.96 5.03 5.39 4.95 5.34
ImAP 4 3.06 3.28 3.16 3.10 3.32 3.09 3.36 3.21 3.38
ImAP2 4 2.49 2.80 2.59 2.54 2.82 2.52 2.90 2.72 2.89
ImAP3 4 12.34 12.40 12.27 12.32 12.34 12.39 12.68 12.13 12.19
CLRPC1 4 4.97 5.25 5.01 5.14 5.23 5.04 5.44 5.05 5.29
SC 1 5.29 5.19 4.83 4.77 4.83 4.98 5.00 5.10 5.43
CLRPC2 1 5.42 5.17 5.00 4.57 4.71 5.01 5.06 4.98 5.34
TC 1 5.28 5.13 4.84 4.78 4.79 5.04 4.90 5.08 5.42
B. β1=β2=0.2
SI 4 5.10 5.01 4.73 5.05 4.92 5.39 5.13 4.80 4.67
ImAP 4 8.45 26.05 60.20 8.03 10.57 10.68 11.13 10.81 10.69
ImAP2 4 2.56 2.60 2.51 2.87 2.62 2.80 2.82 2.58 2.48
ImAP3 4 79.41 99.42 100.00 77.02 88.38 89.14 89.19 89.08 88.92
CLRPC1 4 4.93 5.13 5.07 5.40 4.81 5.08 5.15 4.70 5.06
SC 1 5.43 4.97 5.21 5.66 5.04 5.28 5.03 4.91 4.81
CLRPC2 1 4.98 4.87 4.76 5.52 4.98 5.43 5.38 4.71 5.29
TC 1 5.03 4.94 5.77 5.44 5.30 5.44 5.24 5.06 5.17

Each entry represents an average over 10,000 simulated data sets. p, disease prevalence in the population.