Table 1. Incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of different activities for treatment group compared to control group: mixed effects poisson regression analysis that adjusted for offspring weight, gender, random selection, and testing time and day.

P<0.008 was considered significant.

		TLMA	Rear	Central	Peripheral	Fine	Total Ambulation
Treatment group (vs. control group)	Overall Unadjusted IRR (95%CI) P value	1.115 (0.951–1.308) P = .180	1.123 (0.903–1.396) P = .296	0.996 (0.788–1.258) P = .971	1.132 (0.962–1.333) P = .136	1.092 (0.945–1.262 P = .231	1.134 (0.953–1.350) P = .157
	Overall Adjusted IRR (95%CI) P value	1.140 (0.989–1.315) P = .071	1.148 (0.939–1.403) P = .179	0.976 (0.777–1.225) P = .832	1.167 (1.007–1.352) P = .040	1.113 (0.979–1.266) P = .102	1.181 (1.007–1.385) P = .041
	Adjusted IRR for Male Offspring (95% CI) P value	1.121 (0.934–1.569) P = .147	1.325 (1.012–1.737) P = .041	0.936 (0.685–1.279) P = .680	1.257 (0.980–1.611) P = .071	1.220 (1.020–1.460) P = .029	1.211 (0.978–1.499) P = .079
	Adjusted IRR for Female Offspring (95% CI) P value	0.986 (0.797–1.219) P = 0.893	0.932 (0.697–1.246) P = .635	0.951 (0.734–1.233) P = .705	0.978 (0.782–1.234) P = .846	0.926 (0.777–1.102) P = .387	1.039 (0.818–1.320) P = .752

TLMA, total locomotor activity was calculated from addition of central and periphery gross motor activity and fine activity. N = 16/group.