Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Cell Biochem. 2008 Aug 15;104(6):2217–2227. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21780

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Contractile amplitude (A), rate of contraction (B) and rate of relaxation (C) obtained from chick cardiomyocytes in culture. Forty points were tracked per monolayer, as illustrated in Figure 3, and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. Data from two monolayers for each nucleotide level of treatment were averaged and normalized to the average pre-treatment amplitude or rate of contraction. Error bars represent the SEM. ** Represents P≤0.01 where 2 mM dATP/4 mM ATP (2/4) is compared to 6 mM ATP control (0/6). In (A) and (C), ATP control (0/6) was not significantly different from pretreatment control (P), while in (B) ATP control (0/6) was significantly lower than P. [Δ] Represents P≤0.05 where ATP control was compared to P. Temperature was 25°C.