Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 14;4:122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00122

Table 3.

Association between selected variables and current FP use (n = 160).

Variables Current use of contraception
p-Value OR (95% CI)
Yes No
Husband involvement in FP-related decision-making
Yes 36 (31.0) 80 (69.0) 0.001 4.6 (1.5–14.0)
No 3 (6.8) 41 (93.2)
Educational status of husband
Madarasa only 7 (24.1) 22 (75.9) 0.35
Modern education only 10 (23.8) 32 (76.2)
Both madarasa and modern education 6(15.4) 33 (84.6)
Illiterate 16 (32.0) 34 (68.0)
Plan for children in future
Yes 9 (10.8) 74 (89.2) <0.001 0.2 (0.1–0.4)
No 30 (39.0) 47 (61.0)
Difficulty in using the word “Family planning”
No 34 (27.0) 92 (73.0) 0.14 2.1 (0.8-6.0)
Yes 5 (14.7) 29 (85.3)
Enough human resource to provide FP services
No 9 (42.9) 12 (57.1) 0.03 2.7 (1.1–7.1)
Yes 30 (21.6) 109 (78.4)
Accessibility to services by Muslim community
No 21 (18.1) 95 (81.9) 0.003 0.3 (0.1–0.7)
Yes 18 (40.9) 26 (59.1)
Educational level of the respondents
Illiterate 24 (25.3) 71 (74.7) 0.82
Madarasa education only 12 (23.5) 39 (76.5)
Modern education only 2 (33.3) 4 (66.7)
Both madarasa and modern education 1 (12.5) 7 (87.5)
Number of children
Less than or equal to 3 13 (18.8) 56 (81.2) 0.16 0.6 (0.3–1.2)
More than 3 26 (28.6) 65 (71.4)
Occupation of the husband
Agriculture 13 (29.5) 31 (70.5) 0.39
Labor 24 (24.0) 76 (76.0)
Business 2 (12.5) 14 (87.5)
Occupation of the respondents
Agriculture 32 (23.0) 107 (77.0) 0.31 0.6 (0.2–1.6)
Others (labor + business) 7 (33.3) 14 (66.7)
Experienced adverse effects due to use of FP methods
No 26 (21.3) 96 (78.7) 0.11 0.5 (0.2–1.2)
Yes 13 (34.2) 25 (65.8)
Received FP information from at least one source
No 6 (5.0) 114 (95.0) <0.001 0.01 (0.004–0.04)
Yes 33 (82.5) 7 (17.5)

Figures in parenthesis indicate percentages.

Figures in bold indicate significant at 95% CI.

OR, odds ratio (calculated for only two categories); CI, confidence interval.