Skip to main content
. 2016 May 30;18(5):e140. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5221

Table 2.

Clinical and feasibility evaluation of telemedicine consultations in patients who were referred to specialists for headaches.

Consultation form
Telemedicine, N=200 Traditional, N=202 P-value
Clinical variables




Change in diagnosis, n (%) 43 (21.5) 40 (19.8) .77

Additional diagnosis, n (%) 109 (54.5) 118 (58.4) .49

Additional MRI/CT, n (%) 74 (37.0) 70 (34.7) .70

Nonpharmacologic advice, n (%) 162 (81.0) 170 (84.6) .41

Prescriptions, n (%) 164 (82.0) 166 (82.2) 1.00

Follow-up by GP, n (%) 136 (68.0) 129 (63.9) .44

Follow-up by neurologist, n (%) 6 (3.0) 6 (3.0) 1.00
Outcome variables




Dropout, medical reasons, n (%) 2 (1.0) 1 (0.5) NA

Dropout, technical failure, n (%) 1 (0.5) 0 NA

Minor technical issues, n (%) 21 (10.5) NA NA

Satisfied with sound quality, n (%) 198 (99.0) NA NA

Satisfied with video quality, n (%) 200 (100.0) NA NA

Consultation time, min, mean (SD) 38.8 (9.5) 43.7 (12.3) < .001

Males, min (SD) 35.3 (8.3) 43 (13.1) .001

Females, min (SD) 40.0 (9.6) 44.0 (12.0) .002

aPreparation to visit, min (range) 14.0 (44) 14.0 (29) .56

GP: general practitioner; NA: not applicable; SD: standard deviation

aThe time used by the nurse before each consultation.