Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;4:e2096. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2096

Table 2. Lineær regression analysis of GDS for 60 cognitive intact NH residents with cancer.

Unadjusteda Fully adjustedb
B 95% CIc P B 95% CIc P
Sex
 Men −0.612 (−2.57, 1.35) 0.534 −6.37? (−2.59, 1.35)
 Women Reference Reference
Age (years) 0.316
 65–74 2.733 (−3.46, 0.86) −6.740 (−6.73, 2.61)
 75–84 1,942 (−1.58, 5.46) (−0.82, 5.15)
 85–94 0.364 (−3.11, 3.83) (−2.64, 3.04)
 ≥ 95 Reference Reference
Education 0.200
 Primary school 2.753 (0.33, 5.84) 0.749 (−1.95, 3.45)
 < 3 years after primary school 2.410 (0.57, 5.39) 1.206 (−1.27, 3.68)
 ≥ 3 years after primary school Reference Reference
Marital status 0.527
 Married or cohabiting −1.300 (−3.46, 0.86) −1.725 (−3.79, 0.35)
 Unmarried 0.408 (−2.47, 3.29)
 Divorced 0.783 (−3.07, 4.64)
 Widowed Reference
Groll’s index −0.531 (−1.24, 0.19) 0.143 −0.338 (−0.93, 0.25)
SOC −0.157 (−0.19, 0.13) < 0.001 0.170 (0.23, 0.11) < 0.001

Notes:

a

Unadjusted for sex, age group, marital status, educational level, comorbidity.

b

Fully adjusted for sex, age group, marital status, educational level, comorbidity.

c

CI: Confidence interval.