Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0147-5

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of UroVysion FISH by patient subgroup

Risk factor Subgroup Method Sensitivity Specificity P-value
Estimate (%) LCI UCI Estimate (%) LCI UCI
Overall None GLMM 39 31 46 82 79 85 <0.001
GEE 38 32 45 77 75 80 <0.001
Age 40 GLMM 17 11 26 93 89 96 <0.001
50 23 16 31 90 86 93
60 31 24 39 86 83 89
70 40 33 47 81 77 84
80 49 41 57 74 68 79
40 GEE 20 14 28 89 85 92 <0.001
50 25 19 33 86 82 89
60 32 26 39 81 78 84
70 39 33 46 76 73 79
80 47 40 54 70 65 74
Smoking Never GLMM 25 18 34 89 86 92 <0.001
Former 46 38 54 77 72 81
Current 41 28 55 80 71 87
Never GEE 26 34 85 85 81 88 <0.001
Former 44 52 72 72 68 75
Current 40 51 76 76 68 82
Gender Female GLMM 28 20 36 88 84 92 <0.001
Male 44 36 52 78 74 82
Female GEE 28 22 36 84 80 87 <0.001
Male 43 37 37 73 69 77
Race White GLMM 40 33 47 81 77 85 0.219
Black 31 21 42 87 81 91
Other 37 17 61 83 65 93
White GEE 39 33 46 76 73 79 0.160
Black 31 23 41 82 76 87
Other 35 17 58 80 61 91
Indication Hematuria GLMM 26 19 35 88 84 92 <0.001
Cancer 46 38 54 76 71 80
Other 28 19 40 87 80 92
Hematuria GEE 29 22 37 83 79 86 <0.001
Cancer 44 38 52 71 67 75
Other 31 22 41 82 75 87