Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;10(3):303–314.

Table 4.

Efficacy of methanolic extracts of nine plant species against Anopheles stephensi

No Plant name LC50 (ppm) 95% FL LC90 (ppm) 95% FL Slope±SE Heterogeneity (df) Regression equation
1 Annona reticulata* 262.71 197.21–337.54 636.94 457.41–1434.98 3.33±0.49 2.89(3) Y=3.33X±3.06
2 Cosmos bipinnatus 258.39 105.36–471.41 1048.00 544.56–1326.18 2.10±0.45 5.74(3) Y=2.10X±0.68
3 Gossypium herbaceum 298.80 62.13–768.79 1221.72 564.60–1130.12 2.09±0.55 8.40(3) Y=2.09X±0.18
4 Laurus nobilis 336.57 222.28–475.98 1197.75 757.60–3516.32 2.32±0.33 2.82(3) Y=2.32X±0.87
5 Abutilon indicum 372.81 231.41–532.21 1000.95 655.62–4054.35 2.98±0.56 4.51(3) Y=2.98X±2.68
6 Hyptis suaveolens 391.66 361.46–422.54 843.60 748.86–986.10 3.84±0.31 1(3) Y=3.84X±4.97
7 Passiflora foetida 441.01 409.18–473.62 922.27 820.34–1077.59 3.99±0.33 1(3) Y=3.99X±5.57
8 Annona glabra 448.78 338.06–570.24 900.18 675.62–1951.54 4.23±0.69 3.94(3) Y=4.23X±6.24
9 Thespesia populnea 840.69 801.16–880.57 1344.01 1249.14–1478.27 6.28±0.50 1(3) Y=6.28X±13.39

Note: LC50 median lethal concentration, FL, fiducial limits, LC90 lethal concentration, df, degree of freedom.

*

Difference in LC50 from the extracts of other eight plants is significant based on non-overlapping 95 % fiducial limits (P< 0.05).