Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;10(2):148–158.

Table 3.

Effect of different concentrations of in aqueous solution on tick larvae after 24 h (n=100 larvae in 5 replicates)

S Material 24 hours
1 Water only 0 (0%)a
2 N. sativa aqu 1% 0 (0%)a
3 N. sativa aqu 3% 338 (67.6%)d
4 N. sativa aqu 5% 500 (100%)g
5 N. sativa aqu 10% 500 (100%)g
6 N. sativa aqu 20% 500 (100%)g
7 N. sativa aqu 50% 500 (100%)g
8 N. sativa aqu 100% 500 (100%)g
9 Thyme aqu 1% 0 (0%)a
10 Thyme aqu 3% 145 (29.0%)b
11 Thyme aqu 5% 251 (50.2%)c
12 Thyme aqu 10% 342 (68.4%)d
13 Thyme aqu 20% 417 (83.4%)e
14 Thyme aqu 50% 426 (85.2%)e, f
15 Thyme aqu 100% 435 (87.0%)e, f
16 Spinosadaqu 2μl/50ml 446 (89.2%)f
17 Spinosad aqu20μl/50ml 500 (100%)g
18 Spinosad aqu40μl/50ml 500 (100%)g
19 Spinosadaqu 10% 500 (100%)g
20 Spinosadaqu 25% 500 (100%)g
21 Spinosadaqu 50% 500 (100%)g

aqu: Aqueous form

N: The total number of died larvae

%: Percentage of died ticks in relation to studied sample (500) of each group,

a,b,c,d,e,f,g:

Homogenous groups so that, similar letters are not-significantly different, while different letters are significantly different.