Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;82(13):3900–3912. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00498-16

TABLE 5.

Presence of antimicrobial resistance genes identified by in silico analysis in the genomes of the strains analyzed in this studya

Strainb aadAc aph3c aph6c strAc strBc blaTEMd floRe sul2f tetAg tetBg tetCg tetMg
1357-A +
1676-A +
1692-A + + +
1740-A-A +
1740-A-B +
1802-A +
1895-A + + +
1914-A + + +
1958-A-B +
2139-A + +
2152-B + + + +
2194-B + + + +
2228-A +
3674-A + + + +
4170 +
4196 +
4271-C + + +
4277-H-A +
4368-A + + + +
4435-B +
4592-A +
4730-C + + + +
4822-A + +
4848-A-B + + +
4860-A +
5019-A +
5196-B +
5583-H + + +
5687-B +
ATCC BAA-2196 + + +
CVM10026 + + + + +
CVM9942 + +
CVM9952 +
2010C-4788 +
2011C-3274 +
a

+, present; −, absent.

b

The strains sequenced in this study are shown in boldface. Only strains that carried antimicrobial resistance genes are shown.

c

Aminoglycoside resistance.

d

Beta-lactamase resistance.

e

Phenicol resistance.

f

Sulfonamide resistance.

g

Tetracycline resistance.