Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Jul 14;26(9):1315–1327. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0626-0

Table 1.

Characteristics of the cohort studies included in the pooled analyses of vitamin intake and ovarian cancer risk

Study Follow-up period Baseline age range (years) Baseline cohort size1 No. of cases2
Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Cohort (BCDDP) 1987-1999 40-93 32,885 142
Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) 1980-2000 40-59 49,613 223
Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort (CPS II) 1992-2001 50-74 61,201 278
Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS) 1986-2001 55-69 28,486 208
Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS) 1986-1995 55-69 62,412 208
New York State Cohort (NYSC) 1980-1987 50-93 22,550 77
New York University Women's Health Study (NYUWHS) 1985-1998 34-65 12,401 65
Nurses’ Health Study (a) (NHSa) 1980-1986 34-59 80,195 120
Nurses’ Health Study (b) (NHSb) 1986-2002 40-65 59,5383 315
Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II) 1991-2000 27-44 91,514 52
Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC) 1987-2004 40-74 60,600 285
1

Cohort sizes after applying study-specific exclusion criteria and then excluding women with loge-transformed energy intake values greater than three standard deviations from the study-specific mean, with previous cancer diagnoses (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) and who had previously had a bilateral oophorectomy (except in the New York State Cohort where this information was not collected); the Canadian National Breast Screening Study and the Netherlands Cohort Study are analyzed as case-cohort studies so their baseline cohort size does not reflect the above exclusions; total cohort size is 501,857

2

Total number of cases is 1,973

3

Nurses’ Health Study (b) is not included as part of total cohort size since they are a subset of the women in Nurses’ Health Study (a)