Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 14;11(6):e0157539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157539

Table 4. Log10 reductions in the concentration (copies g-1 compost dry weight) of 12 different antimicrobial resistance determinants from day 0 to day 99 in composted manure from cattlea.

Resistance determinant CON DDG CON C&D
erm(A) -1.51 ± 0.37 -1.28 ± 0.51 -1.17 ± 1.28
erm(B) -1.71 ± 0.52 -1.66 ± 0.31 -1.50 ± 0.57
erm(F) -0.92 ± 1.38 -0.28 ± 1.01 -1.46 ± 0.87
erm(X) -1.00 ± 0.42 -0.46 ± 0.4 -0.42 ± 0.64
tet(B) -1.15 ± 0.23a -0.45 ± 0.26b -0.23 ± 0.62b
tet(C) -1.94 ± 0.38b 0.45 ± 0.47a 0.01 ± 1.09a
tet(H) -2.79 ± 0.62 -1.86 ± 0.45 -2.53 ± 1.46
tet(L) -0.97 ± 0.38 -0.61 ± 0.29 -0.88 ± 0.82
tet(M) -2.6 ± 0.58b -1.63 ± 0.38a -1.37 ± 0.60a
tet(W) -1.55 ± 0.41 -1.52 ± 0.30 -1.87 ± 0.96
sul1 -0.66 ± 0.74 -0.88 ± 0.43 -1.47 ± 1.01
sul2 -1.37 ± 1.00 -1.62 ± 0.47 -2.41 ± 0.81

a CON, manure from cattle on a control diet of barley; DDG, manure from cattle fed dried distillers grains and solubles; CON C&D, manure from the control diet cattle amended with construction and demolition waste. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 6) with top and middle depths combined for analysis. Means with different lowercase letters and in bold in rows are significantly different from one another (P < 0.05).