Table 3. Pod shattering resistance of different cultivars in 2012–2014.
Cultivars | 2012–2013 | 2013–2014 |
---|---|---|
Huahang 901 | 0.45 a | 0.95 a |
Zhongshuang 12 | 0.27 b | 0.9 ab |
Zhongshuang 9 | 0.25 b | 0.85 ab |
Zhongshuang 11 | 0.22 bc | 0.84 ab |
2012-C1107 | 0.21 bc | 0.8 bc |
Yangguang 2009 | 0.15cd | 0.70 c |
2012-C1103 | 0.12 de | 0.59 d |
Huashuang 5 | 0.06 ef | 0.29 e |
Mean | 0.22 | 0.74 |
CV% | 55 | 29 |
Zhongyouza 12 | 0.14 cd | 0.24 e |
Zhongnongyou 9 | 0.09d ef | 0.22 ef |
Huayouza 10 | 0.05 ef | 0.12 fg |
Dadi 55 | 0.03 f | 0.10 g |
Huayouza 62 | 0.03 f | 0.06 g |
Huayouza 9 | 0.02 f | 0.05 g |
Zhongnongyou 6 | 0.01 f | 0.03 g |
Fengyou 520 | 0.00 f | 0.02 g |
Mean | 0.04 | 0.11 |
CV% | 109 | 79 |
Significance of variance | ||
F value | F 0.05 | |
Year (Y) | 670.386** | 4.001 |
Cultivar (C) | 112.516** | 1.836 |
Y×C | 32.375** | 1.836 |
Values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (P< 0.05); Each data represents the mean of three replications. NS means not significant;
*and **means significant differences at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively;
CV, coefficient of variation.