Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 9;24(4):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.08.002

Table 2.

Advantages of micro-emulsion over emulsion (Holmberg et al. (2010).

Sr. no. Conventional (macro) emulsion Micro-emulsion
1 graphic file with name fx1.gif graphic file with name fx2.gif
2 Two phase system renders it thermodynamically unstable One phase system renders it thermodynamically stable
3 Poorer long term storage stability and often tend to coalesce, creaming/sedimentation or phase separation Better long term storage stability
4 Comparatively less bioavailability Reduction in dose by the enhancement in bioavailability
5 Comparatively less lipophilic transport Enhanced lymphatic transport due to lipids Holm et al. (2003)
6 High intra and inter subject variability Reduced intra and inter subject variability Gattefosse-self emulsifying formulation (2013)
7 Difficult manufacturing and scale up Easy manufacture and scale up
8 Thermodynamically unstable Excellent kinetic stability
9 Cloudy white Clear
10 Large input of energy for method of preparation No large input of energy for method of preparation
11 Globule size more than 500 nm Micelle size are 5–500 nm