Table 2.
CSER Consortium R-Awards
| Project Name | Institutionsa | Project Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Challenges of Informed Consent in Return of Data From Genomic Research | Columbia University∗ | developing a menu of approaches to deal with the challenges of informed consent for genomic research |
| Disclosing Genomic Incidental Findings in a Cancer BioBank: An ELSI Experiment | Mayo Clinic,∗ University of Minnesota, University of California, San Francisco | determining how to manage return of results and secondary findings to family members, including after the death of the research participant |
| Impact of Return of Incidental Genetic Test Results to Research Participants in the Genomic Era | Columbia University∗ | investigating preferences of participants enrolled in genomic research about the disclosure of incidental genetic test results and the psychosocial and behavioral impact of these disclosures |
| Innovative Approaches to Returning Results in Exome and Genome Sequencing Studies | Seattle Children’s Hospital∗ | comparing traditional results-disclosure sessions (with a genetic counselor and over the phone) with an innovative web-based tool |
| Presenting Diagnostic Results from Large-Scale Clinical Mutation Testing | Cleveland Clinic,∗ Mayo Clinic | examining participant and professional understandings of diagnostic results from large-scale clinical mutation testing and attitudes toward testing |
| Return of Research Results From Samples Obtained for Newborn Screening | Johns Hopkins University∗ | evaluating current existing state policies regarding the storage of dried blood spots after newborn screening and associated research use to develop policy recommendations |
| Returning Research Results in Children: Parental Preferences and Expert Oversight | Boston Children’s Hospital∗ | exploring research-participant preferences in the return of individual genomic research results and how this might be incorporated into registry and/or biobank research structure |
| Returning Research Results of Pediatric Genomic Research to Participants | Vanderbilt University,∗ McGill University, Baylor College of Medicine, University of Chicago | exploring legal issues raised by the return of genomic research results in minors |
| The Presumptive Case Again Returning Individuals Results in BioBanking Research | Children’s Mercy Hospital∗ | analyzing claims that the return of bio-repository results is morally obligatory or permissible in genomic research |
Asterisks denote lead institutions.