Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 6;19(3):151–155. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.03.003

Table 3.

Comparison of the nail sizes derived from the various anthropometric parameters after correction with the ideal nail size.

Measurement Correlation to ideal nail [r (p)] Accuracy (%) Incidence of incorrect nail predicted (%, 95% CI) Incidence of longer than ideal nail (%, 95% CI) Incidence of shorter than ideal nail (%, 95% CI)
(TT-A) +11 nail 0.966 (p = 0.01) 81 19 (0.11–0.27) 8 (0.03–0.13) 11 (0.05–0.17)
(K-MM) −33 nail 0.953 (p = 0.01) 69 31 (0.22–0.40) 10 (0.04–0.16) 21 (0.13–0.29)
(K-A) −25 nail 0.960 (p = 0.01) 76 24 (0.16–0.32) 13 (0.06–0.20) 11 (0.05–0.17)
(O-MH) +6 nail 0.853 (p = 0.01) 51 49 (0.39–0.59) 20 (0.12–0.28) 29 (0.20–0.38)
BH (equation) nail 0.776 (p = 0.01) 34 66 (0.57–0.75) 25 (0.17–0.34) 41 (0.31–0.51)