Table 1.
Results and comparison between the +2.5 D ReSTOR and +3.0 D Oculentis group.
Variables | Group | N | Mean | Std. deviation | Std. error mean | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative refraction | Oculentis | 41 | −1.896 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.251 |
ReSTOR | 30 | −0.925 | 2.0 | 0.4 | ||
| ||||||
Preoperative UDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.624 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.322 |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.690 | 0.3 | 0.1 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative refraction | Oculentis | 41 | −0.860 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.001 ∗ |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.058 | 0.3 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative UDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.056 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.500 |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.033 | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative UNVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.098 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.001 ∗ |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.587 | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative UIVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.312 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.049 ∗ |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.287 | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative CDVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.509 |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.007 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative CNVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.210 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.001 ∗ |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.153 | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||
| ||||||
Postoperative CIVA | Oculentis | 41 | 0.315 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.005 ∗ |
ReSTOR | 30 | 0.277 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
∗ p < 0.05 is statistically significant.