Skip to main content
. 2016 May 29;11:751–759. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.018

Table 5.

The Pearson's R correlation between the predicted outcomes in the test set using the trained linear regression models and the clinical scores of the test set.

GM models
WM models
WM/GM combined
Pearson's R correlation 95% confidence interval Pearson's R correlation 95% confidence interval Pearson's R correlation 95% confidence interval
AHA 0.504 (0.200, 0.719) 0.641⁎⁎ (0.387, 0.805) 0.670⁎⁎⁎ (0.429, 0.822)
BRIEF − 0.006 (− 0.392, 0.382) 0.263 (− 0.138, 0.590) 0.269 (− 0.132, 0.594)
SDQ 0.182 (− 0.327, 0.610) 0.742⁎⁎ (0.408, 0.901) 0.751⁎⁎ (0.424, 0.905)
TVPS 0.533 (0.184, 0.763) 0.304 (− 0.094, 0.619) 0.614⁎⁎ (0.297, 0.809)
WR 0.435 (0.057, 0.704) 0.063 (− 0.332, 0.440) 0.493 (0.130, 0.739)
VOC 0.077 (− 0.319, 0.452) − 0.073 (− 0.448, 0.323) 0.085 (− 0.313, 0.457)

Correlations in bold have a statistical significance of p < 0.008. AHA, Assisting Hand Assessment; BRIEF, Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function; GM, grey matter; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; TVPS, Test of Visual Perception Skills; VOC, vocabulary; WM, white matter; WR, word reasoning.

p < 0.008, statistically significant correlations.

⁎⁎

p < 0.0016, statistically significant correlations.

⁎⁎⁎

p < 0.00016, statistically significant correlations.