Skip to main content
. 2016 May 29;11:751–759. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.018

Table 6.

ANOVA comparisons between the GM and WM only models, and the models combining WM and GM lesion involvement.

Residual sum of squares Degrees of freedom Mean square F Significance
AHA
WM/GM combined 81,617
WM only 93,130 − 6 − 11,514 2.563 0.023
GM only 110,550 − 8 − 28,933 4.830 < 0.001⁎⁎⁎



BRIEF
WM/GM combined 735,037
WM only 825,191 − 7 − 90,154 1.542 0.164
GM only 973,689 − 4 − 238,652 7.143 < 0.001⁎⁎⁎



SDQ
WM/GM combined 6013.7
WM only 6386.7 − 7 − 373.07 0.541 0.800
GM only 11,366.0 − 8 − 5352.3 6.787 < 0.001⁎⁎⁎



TVPS
WM/GM combined 439,456
WM only 414,153 − 2 − 215,837 21.365 < 0.001⁎⁎⁎
GM only 655,292 − 6 − 40,342 1.331 0.252



WR
WM/GM combined 27,956
WM only 29,640 − 4 − 3228.4 2.598 0.041
GM only 31,184 − 4 − 1684.1 1.355 0.256



VOC
WM/GM combined 81,786
WM only 148,175 − 4 − 66,390 18.264 < 0.001⁎⁎⁎
GM only 96,119 − 5 − 14,333 3.155 0.011

Asterisked correlations were found to be statistically significant: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AHA, Assisting Hand Assessment; BRIEF, Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function; GM, grey matter; SDQ, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; TVPS, Test of Visual Perception Skills; VOC, vocabulary; WM, white matter; WR, word reasoning.