Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Sep 22;50(1):134–136. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.198

Table 2.

Cox multivariate analyses of patient and disease related factors affecting OS, PFS, CIR, and NRM.

OS p-value Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Type of transplant <0.0001 0.36 (0.22, 0.59)
 Auto-SCT vs. allo-SCT

Age at transplant, years
 >50 vs. ≤50 0.0007 2.50 (1.47, 4.26)

Disease sensitivity
 Resistant vs. sensitive 0.006 2.14 (1.24, 3.68)

PFS

Type of transplant 0.001 0.48 (0.27, 0.72)
 Auto-SCT vs. allo-SCT

Age at transplant, years
 >50 vs. ≤50 0.001 2.36 (1.41, 3.93)

Number of prior chemo regimens 0.026
 1 1.0
 2 2.09 (0.28, 15.78)
 ≥3 4.11 (0.53, 31.75)

CIR

Type of transplant 0.5945 0.83 (0.42, 1.64)
 Auto-SCT vs. allo-SCT

Months from diagnosis to SCT 0.0062 1.05 (1.01, 1.08)

Disease sensitivity
 Resistant vs. sensitive 0.0109 2.56 (1.24, 5.29)

NRM

Type of transplant 0.0004 0.30 (0.16, 0.59)
 Auto-SCT vs. allo-SCT

OS (overall survival), PFS (progression free survival), CIR (cumulative incidence of relapse/progression), and NRM (non-relapse mortality). Reference groups are allo-SCT, age ≤ 50 years, sensitive disease, and one prior chemoregimen.