Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2016 May 5;111(513):27–42. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1086354

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Simulation result comparing MetaSparseKmeans (EW), MetaSparseKmeans (UW) and sparse K-means under different scenarios. Figure 4(a): varying biological variance. Figure 4(b): varying subtype predictive gene intensity in the first study with the largest sample size. Figure 4(c): varying confounding impacted gene intensity in the first study with the largest sample size.