Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;6(6):e012132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012132

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

Cases
Live-donor kidney transplant recipients
n=21
Controls
Deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients
n=17
Sex (%)
 Women 12 (57) 11 (65)
 Men 9 (43) 6 (35)
Age category in years (%)
 20–39 5 (24) 1 (6)
 40–59 5 (24) 11 (65)
 60–79 11 (52) 5 (29)
Ethnicity (%)
 White 18 (86) 15 (88)
 Other 3 (14) 1 (6)
IMD quintile (%)
 1 (least deprived) 6 (29) 6 (35)
 2 3 (14) 6 (35)
 3 7 (33) 4 (24)
 4 4 (19) 0
 5 (most deprived) 1 (5) 1 (6)
Mean number of potential family donors (SD) 14 (12) 14 (12)
Median number of potential family donors (IQR) 11 (13) 11 (7)
Mean PAM score (SD) 64.2 (12.4) 64.5 (15.5)
Median PAM score (IQR) 67.8 (19.4) 60.6 (24.1)
Per cent of PAM level 4 (95% CI) 38 (15 to 61) 35 (10 to 61)
Mean social support score (SD) 30.0 (6.0) 29.6 (5.3)
Median social support score (IQR) 31.0 (7.0) 30.5 (9.0)
Mean live-donation transplant knowledge score (SD) 6.7 (SD 1.8) 4.9 (SD 2.1)
Median live-donation transplant knowledge score (IQR) 7.0 (2.0) 5.0 (2.0)

IMD, index of multiple deprivation; PAM, Patient Activation Measure.