Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;113(21):365–372. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0365

Table 3. Fall Risk Assessment (Physical Function) and Fear of Falling.

Intervention
group
at baseline
Intervention
groupat
12 months
Control
group
at baseline
Control
group
at 12 months
Difference
between groups
[95% CI]
p-value
TUG (seconds) N=222 N=181 N=155 N=114
13.0 ± 5.5 12.1 ± 5.3 16.2 ± 8.4 17.7 ± 12.6 −2.39
[−3.91; −0.87]
0.014
12.0
(5.5–40.8)
11.0
(4.0–42.4)
14.0
(6.0–45.0)
13.5
(5.0–92.0)
CST (seconds) N=214 N=172 N=137 N=94
17.4 ± 9.3 14.8 ± 6.4 19.4 ± 10.1 17.1 ± 7.9 −0.73
[−2.60; 1.14]
0.466
15.0
(7.0–90.0)
13.4
(6.8–60.0)
16.7
(7.6–68.0)
15.0
(8.0–49.0)
mRomberg (seconds) N=222 N=181 N=153 N=107
25.3 ± 6.2 26.7 ± 5.3 24.0 ± 7.9 24.1 ± 7.5 1.70
[0.35; 3.04]
0.037
30.0
(2.0–30.0)
30.0
(10.0–30.0)
30.0
(2.0–30.0)
30.0
(7.0–30.0)
FES-I (points) N=203 N=167 N=149 N=108
25.2 ± 8.2 23.4 ± 7.4 27.4 ± 9.8 27.5 ± 10.3 −2.28
[−3.87; −0.69])
0.022
23.0
(16.0–58.0)
21.0
(16.0–49.0)
25.0
(16.0–58.0)
25.0
(16.0–54.0)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and median (min–max)

CI: Confidence interval; CST: Chair Stand Test; mRomberg: modified Romberg Test; TUG, Timed-Up-and-Go-Test