Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 27;7(2):76–85. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.14

Table 3 . Studies Using Curcumin as PS .

Author/Year Type Samples Bacteria Groups PS Laser Source Results
da Frota56 2015 invitro planktonic E. faecalis 1a) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+5 min of irradiation, 1b) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+10 min of irradiation, 2a) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+5 min without irradiation, 2b) CUR pre-irradiation for 5+10 min of irradiation, 3a) physiological solution and irradiation for 5 min, 3b) physiological solution and irradiation for 10 min Curcumin
20 μM
450 nm
100 mW/cm2
T: 5 min
Curcumin as photosensitizer was effective by 5 min LED irradiation and curcumin alone was not effective in eliminating E. faecalis.
Neelakantan et al572015 In vitro Biofilms E. faecalis 1) sterile saline, 2) 3% sodium hypochlorite, 3) 3% sodium hypochlorite + ultrasonic files, 4) 3% sodium hypochlorite + blue light, 5) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL), 6) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL) +ultrasonic files, 7) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL) + blue light Curcumin
2.5 mg/mL
380–515 nm 1200 mw/cm2
T: 4 min
Light activation produced significantly higher antibacterial efficacy than ultrasonic agitation, with light activated curcumin producing the maximum elimination of biofilm bacteria within the root canal lumen and dentinal tubules.
Pileggi et al58 2013 In vitro Planktonic suspensions or biofilms. E. faecalis 1) Eosin-Y, 2) Rose bengal, 3) Curcumin Curcumin
1 μM
5 μM
10 μM
(380–500 nm
T: 240 s
450 mW/cm2
Blue light irradiation alone did not alter E. faecalis viability.
For planktonic cultures, blue light activated eosin-Y (5 μM), rose bengal (1 μM), or curcumin (5 μM) significantly reduced E. faecalis compared to non-irradiated group.
For biofilm cultures, concentrations of light-activated eosin-Y, rose bengal, and curcumin of 100, 10, and 10 μM respectively suppressed E. faecalis viability.