Table 3 . Studies Using Curcumin as PS .
Author/Year | Type | Samples | Bacteria | Groups | PS | Laser Source | Results |
da Frota56 2015 | invitro | planktonic | E. faecalis | 1a) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+5 min of irradiation, 1b) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+10 min of irradiation, 2a) CUR, pre-irradiation for 5+5 min without irradiation, 2b) CUR pre-irradiation for 5+10 min of irradiation, 3a) physiological solution and irradiation for 5 min, 3b) physiological solution and irradiation for 10 min |
Curcumin 20 μM |
450 nm 100 mW/cm2 T: 5 min |
Curcumin as photosensitizer was effective by 5 min LED irradiation and curcumin alone was not effective in eliminating E. faecalis. |
Neelakantan et al572015 | In vitro | Biofilms | E. faecalis | 1) sterile saline, 2) 3% sodium hypochlorite, 3) 3% sodium hypochlorite + ultrasonic files, 4) 3% sodium hypochlorite + blue light, 5) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL), 6) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL) +ultrasonic files, 7) curcumin (2.5 mg/mL) + blue light |
Curcumin 2.5 mg/mL |
380–515 nm 1200 mw/cm2 T: 4 min |
Light activation produced significantly higher antibacterial efficacy than ultrasonic agitation, with light activated curcumin producing the maximum elimination of biofilm bacteria within the root canal lumen and dentinal tubules. |
Pileggi et al58 2013 | In vitro | Planktonic suspensions or biofilms. | E. faecalis | 1) Eosin-Y, 2) Rose bengal, 3) Curcumin |
Curcumin 1 μM 5 μM 10 μM |
(380–500 nm T: 240 s 450 mW/cm2 |
Blue light irradiation alone did not alter E. faecalis viability. For planktonic cultures, blue light activated eosin-Y (5 μM), rose bengal (1 μM), or curcumin (5 μM) significantly reduced E. faecalis compared to non-irradiated group. For biofilm cultures, concentrations of light-activated eosin-Y, rose bengal, and curcumin of 100, 10, and 10 μM respectively suppressed E. faecalis viability. |