Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;7:791. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00791

Table 4.

Results of a linear mixed effect model examining the influence of the forest aridity index (FAI) at the place of origin on 27 measured parameters 19 years after planting of the provenance trial in Northern Germany.

RELATEDNESS TO CLIMATE AT PROVENANCE ORIGIN
Variable n α ± SE β ± SE SDprov SDblock SDresid Δi LR P
STAND CHARACTERISTICS
DBH 100 12.67 ± 1.71 −0.18 ± 0.32 1.84 0.21 1.30 1.59 0.41 0.52
Height 100 10.13 ± 1.16 0.001 ± 0.22 1.20 0.54 0.99 2.00 0.00 0.97
AGB 100 56.77 ± 16.19 −2.01 ± 3.04 17.45 0.00 11.91 1.47 0.53 0.47
GROWTH-RELATED TRAITS
BAI 100 25.19 ± 7.78 −1.81 ± 1.46 7.95 0.82 9.92 0.25 1.75 0.19
ABI 100 2.99 ± 0.85 −0.11 ± 0.16 0.92 0.00 0.63 1.47 0.53 0.47
HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES
P12 93 −2.15 ± 0.16 0.01 ± 0.03 0.11 0.17 0.28 1.93 0.07 0.80
P50 93 −3.13 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.02 0.08 0.14 0.22 0.43 1.57 0.21
P88 93 −4.06 ± 0.16 0.04 ± 0.03 0.14 0.07 0.29 0.20 1.80 0.18
KSemp 96 3.70 ± 0.37 0.004 ± 0.07 0.00 0.35 1.03 1.99 0.01 0.91
KStheo 98 3.24 ± 0.51 0.25 ± 0.09 0.10 0.00 1.69 4.26 6.26 0.01
KLemp* 95 2.04 ± 0.18 0.03 ± 0.04 0.00 0.16 0.51 0.98 1.02 0.31
KLtheo* 95 2.09 ± 0.18 0.08 ± 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.61 4.03 6.03 0.01
WOOD ANATOMY
BA 100 2.56 ± 0.15 −0.06 ± 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.51 3.17 5.17 0.02
Agrowth 98 16.42 ± 1.20 0.19 ± 0.22 0.00 0.00 4.07 1.29 0.71 0.40
Alumen : Axylem 98 12.40 ± 1.03 0.48 ± 0.19 0.53 0.00 3.09 3.72 5.72 0.02
VD 98 245.92 ± 15.88 −0.27 ± 2.97 14.11 0.00 31.90 1.99 0.01 0.92
D 98 23.99 ± 0.67 0.43 ± 0.13 0.00 0.00 2.28 7.45 9.45 0.002
Dh 98 32.05 ± 1.07 0.33 ± 0.20 0.58 0.00 3.18 0.84 2.84 0.09
LEAF MORPHOLOGY
Aleaf 100 23.98 ± 2.08 −0.20 ± 0.39 1.82 0.00 4.44 2.00 0.00 0.95
SLA 99 158.61 ± 12.16 −0.72 ± 2.28 0.00 8.79 39.16 1.89 0.11 0.74
AS : AL* 100 0.74 ± 0.12 0.04 ± 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.42 1.04 3.04 0.08
LEAF CHEMISTRY
C:N 100 24.80 ± 0.59 0.25 ± 0.11 0.35 0.00 1.73 3.12 5.12 0.02
δ13C 100 −29.59 ± 0.27 −0.11 ± 0.05 0.12 0.00 0.86 2.63 4.63 0.03
Camass 100 8.52 ± 0.53 −0.06 ± 0.10 0.00 0.15 1.79 1.66 0.34 0.56
Kmass 100 4.54 ± 0.51 0.13 ± 0.10 0.39 0.00 1.30 0.09 2.09 0.15
Mgmass 100 1.62 ± 0.12 −0.03 ± 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.39 0.03 2.03 0.15
Pmass 100 1.21 ± 0.05 0.001 ± 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.18 1.98 0.02 0.89

Given are intercept α and slope β indicating the direction of the relationship for FAI with their corresponding standard errors (SE), standard deviation between provenances (SDprov) as an expression of the variability between provenances, standard deviation of block from the provenance mean showing the design variability, and the remaining unexplained variance of the residuals (SDresid). Further, the results from a likelihood ratio test of the LME against the null model are given; these are the delta Akaike information criterion (Δi), the likelihood ratio (LR) and probability of error (P) for the hypothesis that FAI ≠ 0. Asterisks indicate traits that have been log transformed, for abbreviations see Table 2. Significant correlations of FAI on any given trait (P < 0.05) are printed in bold, marginally significant correlations (P < 0.10) in italic bold letters.