Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0156591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156591

Table 1. Statistical assessment of differences between conditions for each question.

Question No. and attribute addressed Across all groups IBCI vs RHI IBCI vs RTHI RHI vs RTHI
1 (Ownership) 8.4x10-15 4.7x10-7 0.12 2.4x10-9
2 (Ownership) 8.2x10-15 3.8x10-7 2.9 x10-3 7.2x10-8
3 (Control) N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 (Control) 2.5x10-15 2.8x10-7 7.4x10-9 3.0 x10-2
5 (Disownership) 5.4x10-16 2.0x10-7 3.7 x10-2 5.5x10-8
6 (Disownership) 4.2x10-8 4.3x10-6 2.4x10-3 0.14
7 (Disownership) 1.8x10-15 2.3x10-7 3.5 x10-2 6.4x10-8
8 (Disownership) 3.4x10-15 3.8x10-7 6.0 x10-3 3.2x10-7
9 (Independence) 1.2x10-13 3.8x10-7 2.0x10-7 8.9 x10-2
10 (Independence) 3.7x10-16 2.2x10-7 1.0x10-8 2.7 x10-5
11 (Independence) 0.59 1.5 1.2 1.5
12 (Independence) 2.7x10-17 5.5x10-8 3.1x10-11 9.3 x10-5
13 (Independence) 3.4x10-7 7.8x10-4 1.2x10-5 0.38
14 (Independence) 1.9x10-8 5.2x10-4 1.3x10-6 0.61

P-values are given to 2 significant figures. Comparison across all groups was made using the Kruskal-Wallis test (column 2). Comparison of IBCI vs RHI uses Wilcoxon signed rank test, comparison between IBCI vs RTHI and RHI vs RTHI uses Wilcoxon rank sum test because not all subjects performed the RTHI. All p-values of the pairwise tests (columns 3–5) were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Bonferroni correction.