Skip to main content
. 2016 Summer;15(2):ar22. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-07-0112

Table 2.

Comparisons of preinstruction content assessment scoresa

Semester Section n CA1 pre (± SEM) p Value CA2 pre (± SEM) p Value
Fall 2012 traditional 47 0.57 ± 0.03 0.40 ± 0.02
Spring 2013 online 88 0.48 ± 0.02 0.423 0.40 ± 0.02 1.000
Fall 2012 reform 62 0.60 ± 0.02 0.998 0.45 ± 0.02 0.947
Spring 2013 reform a 96 0.46 ± 0.02 0.096 0.49 ± 0.02 0.275
b 114 0.42 ± 0.02 0.003 0.42 ± 0.01 1.000
c 140 0.45 ± 0.01 0.021 0.43 ± 0.01 0.996
Fall 2013 reform a 58 0.52 ± 0.03 0.971 0.44 ± 0.02 0.982
b 72 0.47 ± 0.02 0.257 0.38 ± 0.02 1.000

aStudent performance on preinstruction content assessment varied in different course sections. The three reform sections in Spring 2013 are labeled “a,” “b,” and “c.” The Fall 2013 reformed sections are labeled “a” and “b.” Possible score values range from 0 to 1 (1 representing 100% correct answers selected). p Value shown is a comparison with the Fall 2012 traditional section for CA1 (one-way ANOVA, F(7, 670) = 8.6, p < 0.0005, Scheffé post hoc) and CA2 (one-way ANOVA, F(7, 670) = 3.2, p = 0.003, Scheffé post hoc comparison), with significant differences (p < 0.05) shown in bold.