Skip to main content
. 2016 Summer;15(2):ar22. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-07-0112

Table 3.

Normalized score change by sectiona

Semester Section n CA1 (± SEM) p Value CA2 (± SEM) p Value
Fall 2012 traditional 47 −0.06 ± 0.05 0.04 ± 0.05
Spring 2013 online 88 −0.04 ± 0.04 1.000 −0.03 ± 0.03 0.982
Fall 2012 reform 62 0.21 ± 0.05 0.052 0.01 ± 0.04 1.000
Spring 2013 reform a 96 0.45 ± 0.03 0.000 0.05 ± 0.03 1.000
b 114 0.32 ± 0.03 0.000 0.06 ± 0.03 1.000
c 140 0.23 ± 0.03 0.003 0.03 ± 0.03 1.000
Fall 2013 reform a 58 0.25 ± 0.05 0.011 0.04 ± 0.04 1.000
b 72 0.22 ± 0.04 0.020 0.03 ± 0.04 1.000

aStudent normalized score change on content assessments in different course sections. The three reform sections in Spring 2013 are labeled “a,” “b,” and “c.” The Fall 2013 reformed sections are labeled “a” and “b.” Possible values range from −1 to +1 (1 representing a student who showed the maximum possible improvement on the posttest). p Value shown for comparison with the Fall 2012 traditional section for CA1 (one-way ANOVA, F(7, 669) = 17.5, p < 0.001, Scheffé post hoc), and CA2 (one-way ANOVA, F(7, 670) = 0.6, p = 0.69, Scheffé post hoc), with significant differences (p < 0.05) shown in bold.