Table 4.
Percentage active-learning time | n | CA1 score change | SEM | p Value | CA2 score change | SEM | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.0 | 72 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.002 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.997 |
23.3 | 58 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.020 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 1.000 |
29.0 | 140 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.000 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.995 |
32.0 | 114 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.174 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.000 |
38.1 | 96 | 0.45 | 0.03 | — | 0.05 | 0.03 | — |
aLearning gains increase with increased use of active learning. Normalized score change on CA1 and CA2 by the amount of class time dedicated to active learning (active-learning time percent). p Value shown for comparison with the reform section with the highest percentage of active learning (CA1: one-way ANOVA, F(4, 476) = 6.9, p < 0.0001, Scheffé post hoc; CA2: one-way ANOVA, F(4, 476) = 0.15, p = 0.962), with significant differences (p < 0.05) shown in bold.