Table 1.
Intercorrelations among Self- and Spousal Big Five Judgments and Facial Ratings of Trustworthiness, Dominance and Attractiveness
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Self-reported Neuroticism | - | |||||||||||||
| 2. Self-reported Extraversion | −.33** | -- | ||||||||||||
| 3. Self-reported Openness to Experience | −.11 | .26* | -- | |||||||||||
| 4. Self-reported Agreeableness | −.53** | .14 | .34* | -- | ||||||||||
| 5. Self-reported Conscientiousness | −.28** | .20 | .10 | .40** | -- | |||||||||
| 6. Informant reports of Neuroticism | .31** | −.11 | −.02 | −.12 | −.15. | -- | ||||||||
| 7. Informant reports of Extraversion | −.19 | .61** | .20 | .16 | .19 | −.46** | -- | |||||||
| 8. Informant reports of Openness to Experience | .13 | .10 | .30** | −.11 | −.02 | −.27* | .40** | -- | ||||||
| 9. Informant reports of Agreeableness | −.19 | −.04 | −.05 | .26** | .19 | −.46** | .21* | .23* | -- | |||||
| 10. Informant reports of Conscientiousness | .02 | .08 | −.05 | −.01 | .50** | −.37** | .37** | .33** | .37** | -- | ||||
| 11. Self Positivity Bias | −.73** | .54** | .51** | .80** | .61** | −.23* | .38** | .01 | .20 | .14 | -- | |||
| 12. Informant Positivity Bias | −.16 | .26** | .12 | .13 | 29** | −.73** | .71** | .63** | .65** | .71** | .28** | -- | ||
| 13. Facial ratings of Trustworthiness | .06 | .16 | −.04 | −.11 | .04 | −.17 | .30** | .16 | .03 | .23 | −.02 | .27** | -- | |
| 14. Facial ratings of Dominance | −.07 | −.37** | .14 | .20 | .02 | .07 | −.19 | −.04 | .12 | −.08 | .03 | −.08 | −.33** | -- |
| 15. Facial ratings of Attractiveness | .11 | .15 | −.05 | −.03 | .20 | .07 | .05 | .02 | −.06 | .07 | .06 | ..01 | .26* | .02 |
Note.
*
p < .05;
**
p < .01.
N = 102 individuals embedded in 51 couples. Correlations were computed in a two-level HLM model, which collapsed across all participants (Level-1), irrespective of gender, but accounted for the interdependence in the data provided by the two spouses (Level-2: couple level). Thus, in these analyses, the pattern of correlations is assumed to be identical for males and females. In all the correlations involving the facial trait variables, we controlled for target gender and whether s/he wore glasses.