Table 4.
Fit Statistics for All Models Tested
| Model | d.f. | χ 2 | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | 90% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gartstein et al. (2003; N = 360) | 74 | 302.62 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.090 | 0.080- 0.101 |
| Gartstein et al. (2003), excluding Cuddliness (N = 360) | 62 | 245.73 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.088 | 0.077- 0.100 |
| Gartstein et al. (2005), California subsample (N = 229) | 58 | 177.93 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.074 | 0.062- 0.086 |
| Gartstein et al. (2005), California + Oregon subsamples (N = 608) |
42 | 110.49 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.066 | 0.051- 0.081 |
| EFA Model (N = 380, Figure 1) | 37 | 62.37 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.042 | 0.023- 0.060 |
| MIMIC Model (N = 336, Figure 2) | 60 | 66.28 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.018 | 0-0.039 |
Note. TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CI = confidence interval; EFA = exploratory factor analysis; MIMIC = Multiple Indicator Multiple Causes.