Table 2.
Differences in predictive power for TQT study results when varying in silico models (a) and validation data (b)
Concentration range | O’Hara | TenTusscher-06 | Grandi |
---|---|---|---|
(a) | |||
At TQT conc. | 62% | 50% | 59% |
10-fold TQT conc. | 76% | 71% | 68% |
100-fold TQT conc. | 88% | 79% | 71% |
Concentration range | Q-Patch | Manual and Q-Patch |
---|---|---|
(b) | ||
At TQT conc. | 62% | 71% |
10-fold TQT conc. | 76% | 91% |
100-fold TQT conc. | 88% | 91% |
Data adapted, with permission, from [58].