Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun;21(6):924–938. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.02.003

Table 2.

Differences in predictive power for TQT study results when varying in silico models (a) and validation data (b)

Concentration range O’Hara TenTusscher-06 Grandi
(a)
At TQT conc. 62% 50% 59%
10-fold TQT conc. 76% 71% 68%
100-fold TQT conc. 88% 79% 71%
Concentration range Q-Patch Manual and Q-Patch
(b)
At TQT conc. 62% 71%
10-fold TQT conc. 76% 91%
100-fold TQT conc. 88% 91%

Data adapted, with permission, from [58].