Table 2.
Performance (CV-10 fold) of RF models both balanced and realistic datasets using AAC and DPC features as input at optimized parameters.
Dataset | Features | Thr | Sen | Spec | Acc | MCC | AUC | Parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balanced dataset | AAC | 0.5 | 89.44 | 94.37 | 91.90 | 0.84 | 0.96 | mtry:8,ntree:500 |
DPC | 0.5 | 90.85 | 84.51 | 87.68 | 0.76 | 0.95 | mtry:10,ntree:500 | |
Realistic dataset | AAC | 0.5 | 75.35 | 99.44 | 97.25 | 0.82 | 0.97 | mtry:8,ntree:500 |
DPC | 0.5 | 58.45 | 99.79 | 96.04 | 0.73 | 0.95 | mtry:10,ntree:500 |
It is apparent that AAC-based RF models could achieve maximum MCC value of 0.84 with an accuracy of 91.9% and displayed better performance than DPC-based RF models.