Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;7:940. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00940

Table 2.

Performance of the different databases for the identification of C. haemulonii sensu stricto, C. haemulonii variety vulnera, C. duobushaemulonii, C. pseudohaemulonii, and C. auris isolates/strains.

Species/variety Bruker Microflex LTTM VITEK MSTM


BiotyperTM v.3.1 (% with LS1 ≥ 2) BiotyperTM v.3.1 with in-house MSPs2 (% with LS ≥ 2) IVD (% with CI3 ≥ 60%) RUO (% with CI ≥ 75%) RUO with in-house SuperSpectra (% with CI ≥ 75%)
Candida haemulonii sensu stricto (n = 16) 16/16 (100) 16/16 (100) 16/16 (100) 0/16 (0) 16/16 (100)
C. haemulonii var. vulnera (n = 12) 0/0 (0) 0/12 (0)4 0/12 (0)4 0/12 (0) 0/12 (0)4,5
Candida duobushaemulonii (n = 13) 9/13 (69) 13/13 (100) 0/13 (0)4 0/13 (0) 13/13 (100)
Candida pseudohaemulonii (n = 2) 2/2 (100) 2/2 (100) 0/2 (0)4 0/2 (0) 2/2 (100)
Candida auris (n = 2) 2/2 (100) 2/2 (100) 0/2 (0) 0/2 (0) 2/2 (100)

1LS, logscore values; 2MSP, main spectrum profile; 3CI, confidence interval for a single species; 4misidentified as C. haemulonii sensu stricto; 5not able to find specific masses for the creation of SuperSpectra for the var. vulnera.