Table 2.
References | Brazilian population | Patients/Controls | DRB1* | P-value, OR or RR | DQA1* | P-value, OR | DQB1* | P-value, RR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Susceptibility – Pemphigus Vulgaris | ||||||||
Weber et al. (2011) [7] | Southeastern region of the state of São Paulo | 36/162 | 04:02 | OR=44.6 | ||||
08:04 | OR=18.6 | |||||||
14 | OR=4.8 | |||||||
Brochado et al. (2016) [1] | Northeastern region of the state of São Paulo | 82/1592 | 04:02 | Pc=5.4×10−10, RR=12.54 | 03 | Pc=0.01, OR=2.04 | 03:02 | Pc=2.5×10−10, RR= 2.95 |
08:04 | Pc=5.4×10−5, RR=6 | 03:01 | Pc=3.6×10−4, OR=4 | 05:03 | Pc=0.02, OR=2.74 | |||
14:01 | Pc=5.4×10−10, RR=7 | |||||||
14:04 | Pc=5.4×10−4, RR=16.64 | |||||||
Protection – Pemphigus Vulgaris | ||||||||
Brochado et al. (2016) [1] | Northeastern region of the state of São Paulo | 82/1592 | 07:01 | Pc=0.027, RR=0.28 | 06:02 | Pc=0.0075, RR=0.19 |
RR=Relative risk, OR=odds ratio, Pc=P-values were corrected by the number of alleles tested for each locus.