Table 4.
% Errors in simulated reads | Distance to optimum of BGREAT mapped reads (percentage) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ≥4 | |
0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 99.31 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
0.2 | 98.79 | 0.91 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
0.5 | 97.2 | 2.17 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
1 | 94.88 | 3.72 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.07 |
2 | 90.85 | 6.43 | 1.79 | 0.83 | 0.1 |
Results show the recall of GGMAP and the quality of BGREAT mapping, as represented by the “distance to optimum” value. For instance 94.88% of the reads were mapped without error, 3.72% were mapped with a distance to the optimum of one etc. Due to approximate repeats in human chromosome 1, the reported distance to optimum is an upper bound