Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;17:237. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1103-9

Table 4.

GGMAP mapping results on simulated reads from the reference of the human chromosome 1 with default parameters

% Errors in simulated reads Distance to optimum of BGREAT mapped reads (percentage)
0 1 2 3 ≥4
0 100 0 0 0 0
0.1 99.31 0.52 0.09 0.04 0.04
0.2 98.79 0.91 0.21 0.07 0.02
0.5 97.2 2.17 0.41 0.17 0.05
1 94.88 3.72 0.92 0.41 0.07
2 90.85 6.43 1.79 0.83 0.1

Results show the recall of GGMAP and the quality of BGREAT mapping, as represented by the “distance to optimum” value. For instance 94.88% of the reads were mapped without error, 3.72% were mapped with a distance to the optimum of one etc. Due to approximate repeats in human chromosome 1, the reported distance to optimum is an upper bound