Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;36(2):32–40. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.2.03

TABLE 4. Relationship between metabolic syndrome risk factors and socioeconomic status, fasting sub-sample ages 10–18 yearsa.

Condition Presence of ≥ 1 risk factor(s) Abdominal obesity Low HDL-C
% (95% CI) CV % (95% CI) CV % (95% CI) CV
Income Adequacy (50 missing)
Lowest and lower middle 35.9 (25.9–46.0) 0.14 21.4 (11.8–30.9) 0.22b 19.4 (12.7–26.1) 0.17b
Upper middle 41.8 (34.4–49.3) 0.09 28.1 (19.7–36.6) 0.15 20.2 (15.2–25.2) 0.12
Highest 35.5 (29.8–41.2) 0.08 18.4 (11.7–25.1) 0.17b 17.5 (14.2–20.6) 0.09
Household education (35 missing)
Secondary school graduation or less 43.7 (29.4–58.0) 0.16 31.8 (17.6–46.1) 0.22b 19.3 (6.9–31.7) 0.31b
Some postsecondary 42.8 (32.4–53.2) 0.12 28.3 (13.7–42.9) 0.25b 26.1 (15.1–37.3) 0.21b
Postsecondary graduation 35.3 (31.0–39.6) 0.06 19.8 (14.6–25.0) 0.13 17.5 (14.8–20.2) 0.08

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SES, socioeconomic status.

Note: Small cell sizes prohibited further analysis of BP, glucose and triglyceride risk factors and Aboriginal and immigrant status SES factors.

a

These figures are based on weighted data.

b

These figures are being published with reservation as 0.16 ≤ CV ≥ 0.33.