TABLE 4. Relationship between metabolic syndrome risk factors and socioeconomic status, fasting sub-sample ages 10–18 yearsa.
Condition | Presence of ≥ 1 risk factor(s) | Abdominal obesity | Low HDL-C |
---|---|---|---|
% (95% CI) CV | % (95% CI) CV | % (95% CI) CV | |
Income Adequacy (50 missing) | |||
Lowest and lower middle | 35.9 (25.9–46.0) 0.14 | 21.4 (11.8–30.9) 0.22b | 19.4 (12.7–26.1) 0.17b |
Upper middle | 41.8 (34.4–49.3) 0.09 | 28.1 (19.7–36.6) 0.15 | 20.2 (15.2–25.2) 0.12 |
Highest | 35.5 (29.8–41.2) 0.08 | 18.4 (11.7–25.1) 0.17b | 17.5 (14.2–20.6) 0.09 |
Household education (35 missing) | |||
Secondary school graduation or less | 43.7 (29.4–58.0) 0.16 | 31.8 (17.6–46.1) 0.22b | 19.3 (6.9–31.7) 0.31b |
Some postsecondary | 42.8 (32.4–53.2) 0.12 | 28.3 (13.7–42.9) 0.25b | 26.1 (15.1–37.3) 0.21b |
Postsecondary graduation | 35.3 (31.0–39.6) 0.06 | 19.8 (14.6–25.0) 0.13 | 17.5 (14.8–20.2) 0.08 |
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SES, socioeconomic status.
Note: Small cell sizes prohibited further analysis of BP, glucose and triglyceride risk factors and Aboriginal and immigrant status SES factors.
These figures are based on weighted data.
These figures are being published with reservation as 0.16 ≤ CV ≥ 0.33.