Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2011 Feb;158(2):265–71.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.026

Table VII.

Part I of Sensitivity Analysis. Multivariable Analysis to determine predictors of Eczema Based on Clinician’s Diagnosis at Age 4 Years±

N Eczema/N Total (% with Eczema) Adjusted Odds ratio [95% CI] p-value

History of parental eczema 32/115 (28%) 2.4 [1.4–4.4] 0.003

Egg ingestion before age 1 year 71/426 (17%) 0.9 [0.5–1.6] 0.7

Sensitization to egg (age 1 year) 27/72 (38%) 4.3 [2.2–8.5] <0.001

Sensitization to elm (ages 1,2, and/or 3 years) 16/55 (29%) 2.1 [0.9–5.1] 0.1

Interaction Terms
Dog in home (before age 1; n=197)
 SPT+ to Dog (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 4/17 (24%) 2.6§ 0.2
  versus [0.7–9.9]
 SPT− to Dog (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 24/180 (13%)
No Dog in home (before age 1; n=319)
 SPT+ to Dog (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 14/33 (42%) 1.8 0.2
   versus [0.7–4.8]
 SPT− to Dog (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 51/286 (18%)

Cat in home (before age 1; n=120)
 SPT+ to Cat (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 9/18 (50%) 7.4§ 0.002
   versus [2.2–25.3]
 SPT− to Cat (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 14/102 (14%)
No Cat in home (before age 1; n=402)
 SPT+ to Cat (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 17/58 (29%) 0.6 0.4
  versus [0.3–1.6]
 SPT− to Cat (ages 1,2, and/or 3) 55/344 (16%)

Total cohort size was 636 children at age four; 107 children (18%) met criteria for eczema based on the clinician’s diagnosis

28 (26%) children with eczema based on the clinician’s diagnosis owned dogs; 23 (21%) owned cats; based on the home visit

§

Represents adjusted odds ratio for eczema based on the interaction between pet ownership and skin prick test (SPT)

±

Table E3 represents covariates that remained in the final model after backward elimination with an alpha cut-off of 0.15.