Skip to main content
. 2016 May 24;35(12):1254–1275. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593169

Table 3.

Summary of CG‐MALS analysis of SPOP variants

Model K D (μM)a
SPOP28–359 Isodesmic 2.4 ± 0.4
SPOP mutBACK Monomer–dimer > 500
SPOP mutBTB Monomer–dimer 36 ± 3
SPOP mutBTB–BACK Monomer–dimer > 500
SPOP X‐BACK Monomer–dimer 118
a

When given, the average and standard deviation of three independent experiments are shown.