Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;36(4):237–249. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564456

Table 2. ICC and 95% CIs for Tests of Cognition and Speech Perception from Two Auditory Training Studies.

95% CI
ICC Lower Upper P
Ferguson et al (2014)43
 Digit span 0.88 0.70 0.95 <0.001
 Visual monitoring task: slow (1/2 s) 0.70 0.23 0.88 0.007
 Visual monitoring task: fast (1/1 s) 0.72 0.28 0.89 0.005
 TEA single task (subtest 6) 0.93 0.82 0.97 <0.001
 TEA dual task (subtest 7) 0.83 0.59 0.93 <0.001
 TEA dual-task decrement 0.72 0.30 0.89 0.004
 Digit triplet test 0.87 0.66 0.94 <0.001
 ASL sentence test 0.67 0.21 0.86 0.007
Henshaw and Ferguson (2014)65
 Dual task word repetition (2 task) 0.93 0.85 0.97 < 0.001
  Quiet 0.90 0.78 0.96 < 0.001
  0 dB 0.80 0.58 0.91 < 0.001
  −4 dB 0.35 −3.70 0.69 0.128
 Dual task digit recall (1 task) 0.86 0.70 0.94 < 0.001
  Quiet 0.81 0.60 0.91 < 0.001
  0 dB 0.76 0.49 0.88 < 0.001
  −4 dB 0.72 0.41 0.87 0.001
 Letter number sequencing task 0.83 0.65 0.92 < 0.001
 Competing speech (MCRM) threshold 0.45 0.17 0.83 0.063

Abbreviations: ASL, Adaptive Sentence List; CI, confidence intervals; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; MCRM, Modified Coordinate Response Measure; TEA, Test of Everyday Attention.