Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;22(23):5422–5429. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5422

Table 1.

Correlation between endocan-microvessel density and clinicopathological features and vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression in gastric cancer

Clinicopathologic feature n Endocan-MVD P value1
Gender 0.27
Male 93 18.19 ± 8.240
Female 49 19.79 ± 8.203
Age (yr) 0.32
< 60 78 19.36 ± 8.436
≥ 60 64 18.00 ± 7.982
Tumour size (cm) 0.000a
< 5 79 16.48 ± 9.170
≥ 5 63 21.58 ± 5.799
Borrmann type 0.000a
I 18 11.33 ± 3.970
II 15 11.93 ± 4.651
III 81 21.17 ± 8.122
IV 28 20.14 ± 7.437
Histology 0.25
Adenocarcinoma 118 19.11 ± 8.183
Signet ring cell carcinoma 8 16.55 ± 2.554
Mixed carcinoma 15 17.13 ± 10.602
Differentiation 0.000a
High/moderate 36 11.66 ± 4.623
Low/undifferentiated 106 21.15 ± 7.803
Tumour invasion 0.000a
T1 2 6.33 ± 0.577
T2 30 10.30 ± 4.822
T3 4 16.33 ± 0.577
T4 106 21.56 ± 7.168
Lymph node metastasis 0.000a
N0 33 12.60 ± 7.314
N1 21 17.521 ± 5.662
N2 30 16.96 ± 7.420
N3 58 23.62 ± 7.053
TNM stage 0.000a
I 15 8.80 ± 3.764
II 18 11.38 ± 5.679
III 99 20.85 ± 7.331
IV 10 26.10 ± 2.960
VEGF expression 0.001a
Negative 58 16.32 ± 6.227
Positive 84 20.43 ± 9.015
VEGFR2 expression 0.000a
Negative 66 12.48 ± 5.239
Positive 76 24.19 ± 6.222
1

Student t-test;

a

P < 0.05, statistically significant. VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR2: VEGF receptor 2; MVD: Microvessel density.