Skip to main content
. 2016;36:79–87.

Table IV.

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes following Biceps Tenodesis with and without Rotator Cuff Repair*

No Rotator Cuff Repair (n=15) Rotator Cuff Repair (n=30) p value
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
SF-36 PCS 46.6 ± 12.3 46.2 ± 11.2 0.935
SF-36 MCS 52.0 ± 6.8 52.6 ± 10.6 0.843
ASES 77.4 ± 25.1 83.1 ± 18.6 0.455
DASH 19.2 ± 18.7 8.8 ± 10.7 0.112
SANE 85.7 ± 22.3 90.4 ± 13.7 0.463
SST 10.6 ± 2.6 11.1 ± 1.4 0.500
Constant-Murley Score 88.8 ± 14.8 86.7 ± 17.2 0.674
Would recommend surgery again (%) 93.3 100.0 0.333
Physical Exam Findings
Popeye deformity (%) 6.7 0.0 0.333
Bicipital groove tenderness (%) 20.0 13.3 0.670
Positive Speed’s test (%) 6.7 0.0 0.333
Positive Yergason’s test (%) 13.3 0.0 0.106
Biceps apex difference (cm) 0.9 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.7 0.178
Biceps circumference difference (cm) -0.3 ± 1.0 -0.2 ± 1.4 0.819
Strength (lbs)
 Elbow Flexion -4.4 ± 9.5 -0.3 ± 8.5 0.169
 Forearm Supination 0.3 ± 2.0 -0.7 ± 2.3 0.146
 Shoulder Abduction -2.0 ± 5.1 -2.8 ± 5.2 0.597
Range of motion
 Shoulder forward elevation (degrees) 175.0 ± 12.4 174.8 ± 10.0 0.957
 Shoulder abduction (degrees) 175.0 ± 12.4 174.8 ± 9.7 0.964
 Internal rotation deficit 6.7 6.7 1.000
 External rotation deficit 0.0 3.3 1.000
Complications (%)
 Wound Infection 0.0 0.0 1.000
 Reoperation 0.0 0.0 1.000
 Loss of proximal fixation 6.7 0.0 0.333
*

Listed as mean ± standard deviation except where noted.

Compared to contralateral arm.