Skip to main content
. 2016;36:79–87.

Table II.

Outcomes Following Open and Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis*

All (n=45) Open (n=25) Arthroscopic (n=20) p value
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
SF-36 PCS 46.4 ± 11.5 48.2 ± 10.0 44.1 ± 13.0 0.272
SF-36 MCS 52.4 ± 9.3 53.0 ± 7.4 51.7 ± 11.4 0.675
ASES 81.1 ± 21.1 82.3 ± 20.4 79.6 ± 22.3 0.681
DASH 12.3 ± 14.4 11.3 ± 14.5 13.7 ± 14.8 0.649
SANE 88.9 ± 16.9 88.9 ± 18.0 88.8 ± 16.1 0.981
SST 10.9 ± 1.9 10.8 ± 2.2 11.1 ± 1.4 0.701
Constant-Murley Score 87.4 ± 16.3 88.0 ± 19.7 86.7 ± 11.1 0.774
Would recommend surgery again (%) 97.8 96.0 100.0 1.000
Physical Exam Findings
Bicipital groove tenderness (%) 15.6 20.0 10.0 0.437
Positive Speed’s test (%) 2.2 4.0 0.0 1.000
Positive Yergason’s test (%) 4.4 4.0 5.0 1.000
Biceps apex difference (cm)† 0.6 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 1.0 0.112
Biceps circumference difference (cm)† -0.2 ± 1.3 -0.1 ± 1.2 -0.3 ± 1.4 0.609
Strength (lbs)†
 Elbow Flexion -1.7 ± 8.9 -0.4 ± 7.4 -3.3 ± 10.6 0.307
 Forearm Supination -0.4 ± 2.3 -0.2 ± 1.5 -0.6 ± 2.9 0.654
 Shoulder Abduction -2.5 ± 5.1 -3.8 ± 5.3 -1.0 ± 4.6 0.057
Range of motion
 Shoulder forward elevation (degrees) 174.9 ± 10.7 177.8 ± 9.3 171.3 ± 11.7 0.049
 Shoulder abduction (degrees) 174.9 ± 10.5 177.4 ± 9.3 171.8 ± 11.4 0.081
 Internal rotation deficit† 6.7 4 10 0.577
 External rotation deficit† 2.2 0 5 0.444
Complications (%)
 Wound Infection 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000
 Reoperation 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.000
 Loss of proximal fixation 2.2 0.0 5.0 0.444
*

Listed as mean ± standard deviation except where noted.†Compared to contralateral arm.

Open versus arthroscopic comparison.