Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 3;34(1):97–110. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1132887

Table 2.

Results of multilevel regression analyses after adjustment for background characteristics.

Model: First contact care ni = 32*; nj = 12 534 Model: Treatment of diseases ni = 32*; nj = 12 493 Model: technical procedures ni = 32*; nj = 12 374 Model: Prevention ni = 32*; nj = 12 559
Cons 2.985 (0.069) 2.973 (0.042) 2.105 (0.107) 0.245 (0.018)
Year (2012) −0.089 (0.056) 0.278 (0.043) −0.017 (0.050) −0.054 (0.019)
Age −0.001 (0.000) 0.002 (0.000) −0.001 (0.000) 0.000 (0.000)
Sex (Female) −0.011 (0.009) −0.036 (0.008) −0.152 (0.009) −0.003 (0.003)
Practice location:** −0.163 (0.012) −0.096 (0.011) −0.260 (0.013) −0.003 (0.005)
– Big (inner) city −0.137 (0.011) −0.069 (0.010) −0.203 (0.011) −0.002 (0.004)
– Suburbs/small town −0.069 (0.012) −0.038 (0.011) −0.070 (0.013) 0.011 (0.005)
– Mixed urban/rural −0.003 (0.009) −0.011 (0.009) 0.054 (0.010) −0.003 (0.004)
Duo/group practice***
Variance within countries:
 1993 0.177 (0.003) 0.139 (0.002) 0.196 (0.003) 0.044 (0.001)
 2012 0.176 (0.003) 0.172 (0.003) 0.173 (0.003) 0.019 (0.000)
Variance between countries:
 1993 0.215 (0.044) 0.092 (0.020) 0.684 (0.125) 0.013 (0.003)
 2012 0.159 (0.033) 0.115 (0.024) 0.679 (0.124) 0.014 (0.003)
ICC:
 1993 54.8% 39.7% 77.7% 23.3%
 2012 47.6% 40.0% 79.7% 41.2%
Correlation coefficient of  countries between years 0.633 0.606 0.907 0.444

*Scales were constructed on the basis of the larger datasets including four extra European countries. However, in the main analyses four countries were taken out as these were only included in one of the two years.

**Reference category = rural practice location.

***Reference category = solo practice. Bold = significant at p < 0.05; ni = country; nj = general practitioners. Reference category for practice location is “Rural”; ICC = intraclass correlation.