TABLE 3. Nurse–Family Partnership Canada model components.
Components | Nurse–Family Partnership model in Canada |
---|---|
Program goals | Improve pregnancy outcomesImprove child health and developmentImprove parents’ economic self-sufficiency |
Eligibility criteria | First-time mothersAged < 25 yearsaSpeak EnglishMeet socioeconomic disadvantage criteria |
Referral process | Ideally referred by 16 weeks gestation; must receive first home visit before the 29th week gestation |
Professionals delivering home visits | Public health nurses (PHNs) |
Frequency of home visits | Prenatal: Weekly for 4 visits then bi-weekly (∼14 visits)Infancy: Weekly for 6 visits then bi-weekly (28 visits)Toddler: Once every 2 weeks until 21 months and then monthly for 3 visits (22 visits)Note: If needed, the schedule is adapted to meet the needs of each enrolled participant |
Theories used | Human ecology, attachment, self-efficacy |
Structure of visits | Emphasis on developing a therapeutic relationship using
|
Use of screening and assessment tools | Standard schedule of assessments. Tools used include
|
Education | Comprehensive core NFP education provided with a combination of self-study, team-based learning, webinars, and in-personAbout 20 days for PHNs plus an additional 5.5 days for supervisors |
Caseload | Maximum of 20 clients for a full-time PHN |
Clinical supervision | Structured approach to clinical and reflective supervision including weekly individual case consultations and regular home-visit observations. Ratio of NFP PHN supervisors to PHNs is a maximum of 1:8 |
Abbreviations: BCHCP, British Columbia Healthy Connections Project; NFP, Nurse–Family Partnership; PHN, public health nurse.
To achieve sufficient power to estimate program differences on the primary outcome (childhood injuries), the BCHCP criteria include women aged < 25 years (compared to < 21 years in Hamilton) who are experiencing indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage associated with increased risk for child injuries.