Table 4.
Success/Failure scores for studies (references in the second column) that qualified for analysis.
| Number | Study | Protocol | EEG | Behavior | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | A | M | ||||
| 1 | Allen et al., 2001 | Alpha | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Becerra et al., 2012 | Theta− | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Berner et al., 2006 | Beta1+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Bird et al., 1978 | Gamma+ | 1 | |||
| 5 | Bird et al., 1978 | Gamma− | 0 | |||
| 6 | Boxtel van et al., 2012 | Alpha+ | 1 | 0 | ||
| 7 | Chisholm et al., 1977 | Alpha+ | 1 | 0 | ||
| 8 | DeGood and Chisholm, 1977 | Alpha+ | 0 | |||
| 9 | Egner et al., 2002 | Alpha-/theta+ | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | Enriquez-Geppert et al., 2013 | Theta+ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Enriquez-Geppert et al., 2014 | Theta+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 12 | Hoedlmoser et al., 2008 | SMR+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 13 | Keizer et al., 2010a | Gamma+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 14 | Keizer et al., 2010b | Gamma/beta− | 1 | |||
| 15 | Kober et al., 2015 | SMR+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 16 | Konareva, 2005 | Alpha-/theta+ | 0 | |||
| 17 | Landers and Petruzzello, 1991 | SCP+ | 0 | 1 | ||
| 18 | Logemann et al., 2010 | SMR+/theta− | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 19 | Peeters et al., 2014 | SMR+ | 0 | |||
| 20 | Reichert et al., 2015 | Alpha− | 1 | 0 | ||
| 21 | Reis et al., 2015 | Alpha+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 22 | Reis et al., 2015 | Theta+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 23 | Ring et al., 2015 | Alpha− | 1 | 0 | ||
| 24 | Ros et al., 2010 | Alpha− | 1 | 0 | ||
| 25 | Ros et al., 2010 | Beta1+ | 0 | 0 | ||
| 26 | Ros et al., 2013 | Alpha− | 1 | |||
| 27 | Wang and Hsieh, 2013 | Theta+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 28 | Witte et al., 2013 | SMR+/theta− | 0 | |||
Training results: 1, training success; 0, training failure. “EEG” column lists the results on the modulation of EEG features, “Behavior” column contains the list results in the behavioral domain, G, general effects of the training obtained in any of the investigated behaviors; A, attention; M, memory. Values in column G may also include effects not classified to attention (A) and memory (M) groups.