Table 3.
Comparison results of the betweenness centrality.
| Channel | Block effect F(1, 57)[p-value] | Session effect F(1, 57)[p-value] | Interaction F(1, 57)[p-value] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | - | 6.628 [0.013]↑ | - |
| Fp2 | 4.328 [0.042]▴ | - | - |
| F4 | - | 7.949 [0.007]↓ | - |
| FC1 | 4.153 [0.046]▴ | - | - |
| FC6 | 4.017 [0.0498]▴ | - | - |
| O2 | - | 5.897 [0.018]↓ | - |
| AF3 | - | 5.738 [0.020]↑ | - |
| F5 | 5.553 [0.022]▴ | - | - |
| CP4 | - | 4.490 [0.039]↓ | - |
| P6 | - | 4.094 [0.048]↓ | - |
| PO8 | - | - | 6.388 [0.014] |
The statistical results were obtained by the LMM analyses with main effects of Session (session 1 and session 2) and Block (T1 and T4), and random effect of subject label.
▴
T1 < T4;
↑
Session1 < Session2;
↓
Session1>Session2.