Skip to main content
. 2016 May 5;6(6):885–896. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.006

Table 1.

Summary of Mechanical and Kinetic Properties of Myofibrils From hiPSC-CMs Following Maximal and Submaximal Ca2+ Activation

Myofibril Typea Tension (mN/mm2)b kACT (s−1)c kREL, Slow (s−1)d tREL, Slow (ms)e kREL, Fast (s−1)f
pCa 4.0g

Control (n) 18.6 ± 2.5 (26) 0.51 ± 0.04 (23) 0.30 ± 0.04 (25) 192 ± 7.4 (29) 2.66 ± 0.3 (25)
FCM (n) 8.2 ± 1.4 (15)∗∗ 0.83 ± 0.13 (14) 0.37 ± 0.09 (13) 191 ± 21 (13) 1.69 ± 0.3 (15)

pCa 5.8h

Control (n) 8.5 ± 1.4 (22) 0.39 ± 0.06 (22) 0.30 ± 0.03 (17) 154 ± 7.9 (21) 2.47 ± 0.4 (22)
FCM (n) 5.9 ± 1.3 (14) 0.40 ± 0.04 (13) 0.58 ± 0.12 (15) 186 ± 17 (14) 2.07 ± 0.4 (15)

p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; estimated by Student’s t test.

a

Data are means ± SEM. For the comparison with FCM myofibrils, control1 and control2 data were merged. N = 3 for each condition.

b

Tension, maximal, and submaximal Ca2+-activated tension.

c

Rate of force generation following Ca2+-activation.

d

Slow, rate of the slow isometric phase of relaxation estimated from the normalized slope of the linear fit to the force trace.

e

Slow, duration of the slow isometric phase of relaxation following sudden Ca2+ removal.

f

Fast, rate of the fast phase of relaxation estimated from the time constant of the exponential fit to the force trace.

g

Maximal activating solution.

h

Submaximal activating solution.