Table 3. Pair-wise correlation between the observed and predicted values for grain yield for four models; L = line, E = site, G = genotypic information, A = pedigree, W = environmental variables.
Genomic Model | Testing site | Training site | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Celaya | Delicias | Tepatitlán | Cd. Obregón | Zaragoza | ||
L+E+W | Celaya | — | 0.159 | 0.267 | 0.376 | 0.148 |
Delicias | 0.157 | — | 0.126 | 0.194 | 0.103 | |
Tepatitlán | 0.267 | 0.126 | — | 0.261 | 0.208 | |
Cd. Obregón | 0.377 | 0.193 | 0.262 | — | 0.247 | |
Zaragoza | 0.148 | 0.105 | 0.211 | 0.245 | — | |
E+W+G | Celaya | — | 0.273 | 0.346 | 0.422 | 0.288 |
Delicias | 0.183 | — | 0.164 | 0.166 | 0.136 | |
Tepatitlán | 0.305 | 0.230 | — | 0.280 | 0.252 | |
Cd. Obregón | 0.480 | 0.267 | 0.373 | — | 0.398 | |
Zaragoza | 0.201 | 0.153 | 0.211 | 0.248 | — | |
E+W+A | Celaya | — | 0.293 | 0.404 | 0.450 | 0.295 |
Delicias | 0.209 | — | 0.255 | 0.176 | 0.190 | |
Tepatitlán | 0.325 | 0.281 | — | 0.277 | 0.255 | |
Cd. Obregón | 0.529 | 0.294 | 0.422 | — | 0.428 | |
Zaragoza | 0.206 | 0.179 | 0.209 | 0.249 | — | |
E+W+G+A | Celaya | — | 0.286 | 0.377 | 0.449 | 0.310 |
Delicias | 0.203 | — | 0.203 | 0.180 | 0.174 | |
Tepatitlán | 0.324 | 0.267 | — | 0.290 | 0.276 | |
Cd. Obregón | 0.515 | 0.285 | 0.404 | — | 0.440 | |
Zaragoza | 0.206 | 0.177 | 0.228 | 0.256 | — |
Values from one site (training site) were used to predict a second site (testing site).